Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coláiste Íde agus Iosef


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 01:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Coláiste Íde agus Iosef

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No assertion of notability, wierd use of the fraternity infbox. Naraht (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator - Massive improvement by and, thank you.Naraht (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: I added a newspaper reference which quotes the Minister for Education and Skills at the official opening. As a verifiable high school which currently has over 600 pupils according to that source, I think there is enough for it to survive under WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. (The appropriate Infobox template is a matter for normal editing.) AllyD (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Is this school equivalent to an American High School (ages 14/15 to 18) or an American Community College or an American College?Naraht (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * , this school is in the Republic of Ireland, the article has got nothing to do with America. But FWIW, it's a government school providing secondary grades up to and including university entrance level education to age 18. This will have been revealed when doing WP:BEFORE listing at AfD and while making minor reviewer improvements on the fly . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Curiousity more than anything else. And a fair point.Naraht (talk) 15:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per standard procedure for high schools as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES  and  evidenced by 1,000s of such closures.  The paucity of content is not a reason for deletion, but the article, obviously created by a student, needs a clean up and expansion. The wrong infobox is the first glaring error. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Article cleaned up; minor expansions, and correct infobox added and populated. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment OK, if the next is a Keep, I'll withdraw the AFD...Naraht (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Although this AfD has been withdrawn, WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES recommends that the article should be redirected to the district article and should not therefore be a "Keep". The correct result should therefore be Redirect -- HighKing ++ 15:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Consensus is that simply stating "Keep Per SCHOOLOUTCOMES" isn't enough and that a source now should be provided .... In this case a source has been provided which confirms the existence of the school, I see no valid reason to delete or redirect. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.