Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colamba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The only "keep" opinion is discounted because it does not address the article or the reasons advanced for its deletion.  Sandstein  06:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Colamba

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article is about a Sri Lanka based tabloid. No indication that it is currently in circulation. A STRONOMYINERTI A ( TALK ) 17:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Having ceased publication (if that is true) is not a valid reason for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * True, but search results show this newspaper has little or nothing notable to be included in Wikipedia. A STRONOMYINERTI A  ( TALK ) 17:06, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep: I couldn't understand what is actually in the mind of Astronomyinertia. Initially he is coming out the reason for nomination is - "....No indication that it is currently in circulation" and when Phil Bridger is raising his objection he is jumping into a different reason.Sudar123 (talk) 13:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you !voting for keep, or are you insulting the nominator? → B  music  ian  00:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  00:44, 4 May 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete I jumped in thinking this could be a slam dunk to keep, but between Google and Bing both trying to correct me, and an otherwise sheer lack of mention, no less sources, I can only conclude that is/was very niche, and nothing is verifiable.  Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  01:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.