Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colby College Student Organizations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Colby College student organizations. Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Colby College Student Organizations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organisations. No independent refs. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent sources. Recently added sources aren't independent. Merge and redirect to institution also an option. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep (but fix the capitalization in the article name). Information about student organizations is legitimately part of an article about a university. Furthermore, it's legitimate to split an article to reduce excessive length. This is one of several such splits off the article Colby College. If it were part of the main article, I don't think there'd be any objection to the content. Accordingly, there should be no objection to splitting it off. --Orlady (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing me to Colby College. Many of it's references are primary and self published; I've tagged it as such. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  22:04, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per the rationale above by User:Orlady; makes sense as a reasonable WP:SPINOUT. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.