Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold friending


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Cold friending

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism sourced to a blog. 16 Google hits, nothing on Gnews. I couldn't find a speedy delete criterion for neologisms, unfortunately. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 05:59, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Per above.  Burner 0718  JibbaJabba!  06:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete (ec) Not notable term. An old discussion about neologisms as a speedy deletion category is here. --Vejvančický (talk) 06:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NEO. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 06:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:34, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 08:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete even if it was an established expression it still would not merit an encyclopedia article, rather than a dictionary entry. Borock (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO DRosin (talk) 16:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete article even denotes itself as a neologism -Drdisque (talk) 18:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete it's snowball time. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.