Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold scale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Cold scale

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Orphaned stub on a scale whose existence I can't verify. I haven't encountered it in any book I've seen on music theory or scales. No relevant ghits (particularly damning since guitar learning sites will frequently list nearly every scale known to man, from the common to the vanishingly obscure). And, on the face of it, it makes no sense: the article claims that the scale is a six-note scale that skips two steps of the major scale...which is a seven-note scale. It also says that it's a combination of pentatonic and blues scale, but there are several pentatonic scales. Article creator (and the only editor of the article who wasn't simply adding stub notices and the like) is. I have a sneaking suspicion that Wikipedia is not for things made up one day applies here. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 03:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   —&mdash; Gwalla | Talk 03:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The scale in question does not appear in either of my books of scales, and the article offers no references to verify its existence, much less notability.  OlenWhitaker   • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 03:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 03:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Merenta (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not only not real, but it's impossible to construct the thing from the description.  It's kind of gibberish.  Utgard Loki (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, though I have no problem determining what is meant: starting on C: CEFGBC. Powers T 18:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.