Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Harbour Place


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. the "Cole Harbour" article can be updated to include (with references) the information about this particular recreation centre. It is not notable on it's own, according to consensus here. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  22:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Cole Harbour Place

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is simply a biased advert for a small towns recreation centre, and the foundation which runs it, neither of which claim any notability Jac16888 (talk) 20:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, cut and paste of a brochure for NN community center. --Dhartung | Talk 21:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. Renee (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge I actually live in Cole Harbour and why not merge it with cole harbours article? Thats just my point of view.--Pookeo9 (talk) 23:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete it is unsourced and reads like it's been copied from a brochure or planning document. Reggie Perrin (talk) 18:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.