Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to J. Cole per author's own request. When more sources become available and/or the album is released, it would be better suited for an article. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Cole World

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not yet notable, entire article relies on a single source and it's been that way since the page was created. Nearly in violation of WP:HAMMER if it was a policy. I wouldn't be opposed to a redirect either. Str8cash (talk) 23:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect Yah dude nice to see you back in the AfDs lol. I created the article but im still going to say redirect. It can be restored when there is more coverage. Red Flag on   the Right Side  23:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah i know it's been a while lol. I love J. Cole his new freestyle on Tim Westwood was sick but the album doesn't even have a title. I think when there's more substance it should definitely be restored, but not when there isn't significant coverage on the lp. Str8cash (talk) 23:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Actully the title is "Cole World" sourced reliablly. Red Flag on   the Right Side  23:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually i saw the more recent interview where he said the album isn't called "Cole World", i see it from him, i hear it from him, i'm gonna believe it if it's from him. Str8cash (talk) 00:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It depends on what time your interveiw took place cause I saw a recent interveiw where he said it was "Cole World". Red Flag on   the Right Side  00:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect to J. Cole. Sourcing is minimal, and there are contradictory claims about the title. As noted above, WP:HAMMER says it's too early for an article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.