Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colegio Nacional "Enrique Nvó Okenve"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. BJ Talk 00:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Colegio Nacional "Enrique Nvó Okenve"
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not assert notability, with no other references to it on wikipedia Canis Lupus 23:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC) *Delete It is a word for word copyvio of http://www.shortopedia.com/C/O/Colleges_and_universities and at that website redirects to our article Colegio Nacional. I could not find any other mention of this college, other than at the shortpedia page which in itself is not a reliable source. Was not aware that if a school simply had a name, it was notable and thus worthy for inclusion in WP. I struck my comment and withdraw.-- «JavierMC»  |  Talk  19:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Colleges are generally notable by default, but I'm finding no proof that this even exists, just Wiki mirrors. This source uses the term "Enrique Nvo Okenve", but not in the context of a college, so it may be a hoax. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it is not copyvio; the Shortopedia entry has clearly been copied from Wikipedia. TerriersFan (talk) 02:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and TenPoundHammer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by QuidProQuo23 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 01:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - we keep tertiary college. Its existence is confirmed by a US Government document here. TerriersFan (talk) 02:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That singular source doesn't have me convinced, seeing as it's the only thing right now that so much as verifies the college. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Whether you consider it is enough for notability is one thing but it is certainly enough to verify the existence of the college (assuming the reliability of US Gov documents). We need to be careful to avoid systemic bias in considering pages on such institutions; this is a non-English speaking establishment in a small country whose institutions have a relatively poor presence on the internet. This is an instance where there will certainly be local sources. TerriersFan (talk) 02:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep as college verified to exist by US government source.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 03:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per TerriersFan. We should always keep in mind wikipedia's and the internet's systematic bias against small, non-anglophone and third world countries.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 04:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Passed WP:V. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.