Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Bennett (writer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 23:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Colin Bennett (writer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Do not believe that this is a notable author. Seems to fail WP:BIO. Notability derived from an appearance at a convention and publication of three niche-paperbacks and a few articles in Fortean times? Doesn't seem to pass the muster with me. ScienceApologist (talk) 06:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.   —Artw (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There seems to be little mention of him anywhere, and has precious little notability aside from a few small articles/books. -- ruby. red.  roses  07:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete None of his works are at all mainstream and so don't really contribute any notability. Pointless. Pstanton 08:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not appear to have had a significant impact on the field (WP:CREATIVE). - Eldereft (cont.) 21:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.