Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Keay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Colin Keay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable. No evidence he passes WP:PROF. His claim to maps of Jupiter is based on his own web page only, and would need evaluation by some third party source. Such work would be expected to be very highly cited, but I don't see that in Google Scholar, which shows his highest citations to be 62 and 42, on acoustics of meteors. h=7, which is below the standard in any subject.  DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fringe subjects need better mainstream sourcing than this one has (solely a letter to the editor?) in order to provide a neutral viewpoint on this subject. In addition the sources presented in the article aren't enough for WP:GNG, and he doesn't appear to pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. As the author of this page, I agree that in hindsight, the subject of this page is not sufficiently notable. --Danimations (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable fringe, as everyone including page's creator now agrees.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.