Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Reynolds

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE (actually userfied by RickK). jni 16:43, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Colin Reynolds
Self advertising, non-notable person. SeventyThree 04:20, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC) Nomination was blanked by User:Reynolcr, author of the article about himself. This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 04:34, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just another in a long line of non-notable people writing vanity-filled articles about themselves. Zzyzx11 05:17, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to the userpage and if that's not an option, delete--nixie 05:25, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:55, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Sigh. Inter 14:20, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, it reads like it should be on a dating-site instead. Radiant! 08:59, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Just a vanity page --StoatBringer 10:59, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity. Isn't this a candidate for Speedy deletion? LukeSurl 19:32, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity, sockpuppetry, parentage of the subject in question and even vandalism!  Should be a speedy IMO.  Almost done, however. - Lucky 6.9 23:58, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * As I've said before in such cases, if the user had made any other contributions to Wikipedia whatever, I'd have voted Userfy. But he hasn't, so Delete. Uncle G 07:31, 2005 Mar 1 (UTC)
 * Delete --User:Boothy443 | comhrÚ 07:05, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Save Vanity? Perhaps.  Sockpuppetry?  A far cry.  You should consider it a blessing to your education that you know and have heard about this young man.  He is headed for great fame and influence, and it is only a matter of time before his name finds its place in the ranks of Churchhill.  I am a sooth sayer.  You, Lucky 6.9, are a truth nayer (which, may I add, your name seems a period away from sexual gratification.  And believe me, I should know.  Some girl is always keeping sex from me on the grounds of a period)!  Motion to delete Lucky 6.9 for a profane username!  --Stephen Premo 02:24  2 Mar 2005
 * Moved to User:Reynolcr and deleted. RickK 07:29, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - interesting band member. The Recycling Troll 11:05, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Please note that the above user, who is so kindly letting us know of his troll status, is following me around and making oh-so-minor edits to every article I touch. RickK 22:56, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)