Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin S. Morris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Colin S. Morris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Searches did not turn up the type of in-depth coverage to show they meet WP:GNG, and nothing in the article shows they pass WP:NARTIST.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Citation has been added to article that supports editorial integrity requirement for WP:GNG and representation in a permanent gallery collection of WP:NARTIST — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unjx (talk • contribs) 03:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Signing comment Jim Hawksworth (talk) 04:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails every singe criterion of WP:NARTIST :1) Not regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. 2) Not known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. 3) Has not created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. 4a) is work has not become a significant monument 4b) His work has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition 4c) His work has not  won significant critical attention 4d) His work is not represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. (This last criterion may have been misinterpreted as having commercial gallery representation, but that is not what 4d means. It refers to institutional collections, such as the National Gallery) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mduvekot (talk • contribs) 09:25, June 19, 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  06:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 06:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of significant coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.