Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Teichholtz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 05:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Colin Teichholtz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article appears to fail WP:BIO. Once all the personal life information is stripped away (including the various jobs he has filled over the years) there appears to be little to which to claim notability. A further quick search also reveals nothing particularly notable. Additionally the references, though plentiful, generally only mention Colin with the few focused on the individual failing to display any strong indications of notability. Finally the article appears to be practically an orphan (bar the one mention on a list of Harvard graduates) within Wikipedia with no unlinked mentions either. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 01:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Reuters source and Business Insider source are both in-depth from strong publishers. There is also a vast amount of other coverage in top RS sources, though not all are as truly in-depth. The individual ran billions in dollars in funds, definitely notable. Odd that the page was marked as reviewed just before this AFD came up, not from a reviewer, but an non-extended-confirmed account. Also, an article is not an orphan if it only has one wikilink--it is an orphan if it has none. Cook&#39;s Kitchen (talk) 01:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete:: insufficiently notable for Wikipedia biography; fails GNG. Quis separabit?  03:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Definitely both Reuters source and Business Insider source in-depth. Other sources are good as well. Also per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 06:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- the Reuters source is a routine announcement about the subject's departure from the fund: "Partner to leave hedge fund" and provides no biographical information. The Business Insider coverage is rather trivial and superficial, as in: "Despite his love of foreign countries, the only other country he's lived in besides the U.S. is Hong Kong, where he moved while at Goldman."link. This is insufficient for an encyclopedia entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per K.e.coffman - Was of many managing that billionaire fund. Only mere mentions. Galobtter (talk) 08:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Business insider publishes primarily press releases, and the Reuters items are mere notices. Nothing else reliable.  DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.