Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin perry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 14:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Colin Perry

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I de-prodded this unsourced biography article after the user removed the original template, so I'm bringing it to AfD. Normally I would wait for the article to be built up a bit, but I could find absolutely no sources. Googling any combination of "colin perry" + "1966" / "colin perry" + "strongest", "man of iron", etc. Doesn't seem notable (or true). DMCer ™  05:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I nominated this for a speedy delete. There is no credible assertion of notability on the page, nor does a Google search reveal anything that might be added to the page to justify its inclusion. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  05:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've also been unable to overcome the verifiability issues. The other claims of being related to notable people are useless. &mdash; Ledgend  Gamer  05:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. There is no way in hell this deserves the full five or seven days, whatever.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 05:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * delete Britain's strongest man 1966 is clearly an assertion of importance so AFD is appropriate not CSD, and therefore I've declined the speedy. I couldn't find online references - nor would particularly expect to for a 1960s title, so unless someone can trackdown offline references I support this AFD closing as deletion. I've also fixed the capitalisation of his name, so if this does close as delete then both Colin Perry and Colin perry will need to go.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  12:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax. A7 wouldn't work here/declined.   TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 14:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.