Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collaborative International Study of Managerial Stress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango 123  17:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Collaborative International Study of Managerial Stress
This study appears to only have its own group to verify its own notability. It looks to define its own name using itself as a self-published resource. As a topic it is original research on the topic of actual original research. Google hits for the acronym showed many other uses for the acronym, resulting only in ambiguity. Google hits for the name of the study showed only 46 references and showed insufficient social impact caused by this ongoing study. This article might be transwikied to WikiStudies, or the authors might wish to create the WikiStudies project. I couldn't find any active encyclopedic category for this article to associate, nor could I find any curretnly pertinent Wiki project that would include this article. Ste4k 08:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NOR, only 29 unique Google hits. The article doesn't really explain much about the study, either. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete It's a copyvio from I'd report it as a copy vio but the AfD notice says to not blank the page ... The only other article posted by the same editor is also a copyright violation but older than 48 hours. I've reported that copyright violation. The sooner we delete this one, the better, IMHO Brian 13:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)btball
 * Comment Sadly, it's not a speedy candidate. It's been too long. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 19:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --MCB 05:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.