Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collaborative document review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Collaborative document review

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A personal essay with non-trivial WP:SYN. Guy (Help!) 08:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY and WP:SYNTH as well as generally thin sourcing. SpinningSpark 10:11, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete In addition to the above, it's vaguely advertorial on behalf of "SmartBear" and "PleaseTech". XOR&#39;easter (talk) 16:36, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You mean the pleasetech whose of whose marketing team Sarah Holden forms half? ? Doubtless entirely unrelated to the user:Sarahholden who wrote this article. Guy (Help!) 18:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Doubtless. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Definitely reads like an essay, not an encyclopedic article, and largely unreferenced. As noted, it does come off like an advertisement at some points. – numbermaniac  09:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete this is an attempt at native advertising. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.