Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collabtive (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Collabtive
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article is and never was notable. The article with the same name and subject was already previously deleted in 2008 but then re-created without any sources asserting notability. I propose to delete it again. Anton.bersh (talk) 16:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Primary contributors to the article appear to be the program's developers, one of whom was the article's sole defender at the previous AfD in 2008. Provided references are a couple of reviews, but aside from these I found nothing in depth. --Finngall talk  16:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  16:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nom article created again without adding any reliable sources. Grailcombs (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per Anton.bersh. No sourcing... and nothing had changed since deletion that would merit recreation. Ajshul 😀 (talk) 22:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.