Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collar BDSM


 * Let's delete Collar (BDSM). Do we need articles on every new BDSM crazy thing? Radical WiKi 12:37, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's more to collars in BDSM than just fashion.  The article is brand new (I just finished writing it) and I'm sure there are a few users who can expand it considerably.  Give it a chance.  Also, I think the choice of words "every new BDSM crazy thing" are a bit much.  By all accounts there are millions of people who take this stuff very seriously, and it's been around for a long time.  Collars in particular, and I'm not just saying this because I wrote the article, have a venerable history in BDSM.  Exploding Boy 12:42, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have very little interest in BDSM and even I understand the significance. Ambivalenthysteria 13:40, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * [added msg:vfd] Keep. fabiform | talk 13:41, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, as long as we also get rid of World War I; all that violence is completely unsuitable for children. Meelar 13:47, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I can't see any good reason to delete this article, it covers the topic in an encyclopedic manner and it's information that many folks may quite possibly find useful or interesting. Bryan 14:42, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Encyclopedic.  Agree with Bryan.  Warofdreams 16:50, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Not a stand-alone topic. Merge content into BDSM and delete. Mkweise 19:01, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - second what both Exploding Boy and Bryan have already said Lestatdelc 22:04, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC) (timestamp out of whack because could not access site for 1/2 hour)
 * Keep. - UtherSRG 20:23, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I sympathize with objections, but it's a valid article. Cribcage 20:52, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep Bensaccount 23:31, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep it's a nice article theresa knott 23:35, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. A valid and useful article on a topic of some significance for much of the BDSM community. -- Karada 23:14, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid topic. Davodd 03:03, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, very valid and useful -- Graham :) | Talk 16:20, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I can't see any rational objection to it. Dpbsmith 23:43, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Worst case, redirect and merge to collar. Martin 22:17, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)