Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collar City Bridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 02:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Collar City Bridge
Very little content at all, and this article doesn't show many signs of notability, even though it passes google test. --Nicholas Weiner 21:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Major river crossings are inherently notable and many other bridges crossing major rivers are currently stubs.  There are plenty of reliable sources online.  Additionally, there appears to be some interesting socio-economic history associated with the bridge's construction through a residential area, a history which is the subject of a book currently being written (according to the Times Union).  VerruckteDan 00:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's certainly going to be coverage in the local newspapers from when it was being built. There was a lawsuit against its construction: --NE2 04:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Major interstate river crossing. —Scott5114↗ 05:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually no, it does not carry an Interstate highway. But yeah I can see a point to the fact that it shouldn't be deleted and I'm wrong, but there definitely should be more content.  --Nicholas Weiner 15:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.