Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collarity (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Collarity
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

created for high degree of promotions, nothing else! Light2021 (talk) 20:11, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:46, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO; advertorial on an unremarkable private tech company. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete the passing mentions puffed up in the text are what I could find too - David Gerard (talk) 10:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Bearian (talk) 22:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.