Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collective executive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Collective executive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced and tendentious Rathfelder (talk) 21:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - have you tried to source it? Bearian (talk) 00:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - this is the kind of management theory-topic that shouldn't be written about as being a universal law of the universe but as an idea (who coined the phrase, who supports and opposes it? etc.) But with no sources besides the author's opinion, this is dead. Blythwood (talk) 06:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * and, are you saying that this is so bad it needs to be blown up and re-created? Bearian (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * If you can find decent sources by all means, but as it is it's not encyclopaedic. In so far as there is any proper content it duplicates stuff from Head of state. Rathfelder (talk) 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR.  An article with no sources does not create a burden to AfD volunteers to research the topic and source the article.  Articles without sources should en masse be moved to draftspace, except for the rare exceptions that don't fail WP:V.  Unscintillating (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.