Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collective lounge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  03:05, Jan. 27, 2006

Collective lounge
Not a notable blog, even the article admits that it is writen by people unknown. Grandwazir 04:44, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless the mysterious blog creators step forward and show themselves. Ruby 05:05, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. No (individual) Alexa traffic rank.  BTW I don't think pseudonymity of authors should be a criterion for deletion.  I agree there is correlation with unverifiability in general, but a website could be verifiable and notable despite pseudonymity, for example: Electoral-vote.com's creator was originally pseudonymous, turned out to be a respected Computer Science professor.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-21 07:22Z 
 * Delete doesnt look very notable. quick look at the blog and theres barely any comments on any of the posts -- Astrokey44 |talk 11:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. -- Dragonfiend 18:12, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. - Latinus 19:57, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Eusebeus 20:57, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.