Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colleen 'Cosmo' Murphy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. NAC. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 23:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Colleen 'Cosmo' Murphy
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I was unable to find any material references in reliable sources for the subject of this promotional autobiography. The news references identified were passing references at best. This is not the place of advertising. Bongo matic  06:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete (see below) total WP:VSCA Beeblebrox (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete As advertising and self promotion. Changing to Weak keep per the rewrite and sources. Could use a few more though. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite to avoid WP:AUTO. Is the subject of independent secondary sources.  DJ Magazine did interview her  and the Red Bull Music Academy also profiled and interviewed her, demonstrating the passing of WP:BIO.
 * Comment I hate saying "Delete" but I hate spam and self promotion even more. If the article is kept, and it should be if she's notable and there are sources, then we need to keep an eye on it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The heavy self-promotion version that was in place when this AfD started has been removed and now a sourced non-self-promotion referenced stub is in its place. --Oakshade (talk) 00:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Changing to Keep per the new sources, seems to squeak by WP:N. Although I certainly agree with Mr. Ritzman that we should all watchlist it lest it slide back into shameless self-promotion. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.