Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colleen Rusholme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Colleen Rusholme

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a broadcaster, notable primarily as a single-market radio and television host and voice-over narrator of television documentary shows. This is not referenced to the degree of reliable source coverage needed to get her over WP:GNG for it, however; while there is one reliable source present, it's coverage from the Automobiles section, in the context of having a parallel parking beep guide in her car rather than in the context of any actual career accomplishment that might actually count as a notability claim -- and even if we did accept it as counting toward GNG just because it's in The Globe and Mail, it still takes more than just one reliable source to pass GNG. And the whole thing reads like a thinly veiled rewrite of her staff profile from an employer's website rather than an actual encyclopedia article, to boot. No prejudice against recreation in the future if it can be written and sourced properly, but nothing present here is good enough. Bearcat (talk) 16:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a single source is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.