Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Kumar (2020 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator withdrew. (non-admin closure) The9Man  &#124; (talk) 09:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

College Kumar (2020 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was created by User:B.Bhargava Teja via the IP 183.83.79.10, as evading his block. As seen here, the editing style is eerily similar to the edits that Bhargav made before he was blocked. Kailash29792 (talk)  08:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep A page being created by a suspected blocked user is not grounds for deletion if it has had significant edits by other editors, particularly if there are no explicit issues with neutrality or notability. Passes WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. This just feels like pretty absurd bureaucracy for bureaucracy's sake which Wikipedia is not. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have created a far superior version here, and that should replace this. This should prove Bhargav's guilt. and, can you help me here? -- Kailash29792  (talk)  09:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , Is that what this is all about? You didn't realize a page about the subject had already been created (or just ignored it) so you're now pushing a bureaucratic agenda because you feel your version is "far superior"? Sulfurboy (talk) 09:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, the article is no longer G5 eligible and the argument presented boils down to Kailash having "created a far superior version", which is no argument at all. Kailash's version is A10 eligible. Cabayi (talk) 09:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks as if nom just removed everything from the original article and put in his "far superior" page. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdraw: forgive me for everything I did. -- Kailash29792 (talk)  09:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.