Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Prowler (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

College Prowler
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is purely promotional and does not provide any relevant information Chernysh (talk) 06:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on results when pressing on find tag/link under its talk page. --Firefly322 (talk) 12:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced. I'm willing to accept that this book is notable...if someone can actually demonstrate it.  Following the talk page link that Firefly322 refers to only led me (on the first several google pages) to several links to the publisher's own site, and links to retailers' sites offering it for sale.  All right, I accept these links as proof of the EXISTENCE of College Prowler.  Now the burden on this article's editors is to assert and cite its notability for inclusion on Wikipedia's main namespace.  Remember that multiple secondary sources are required.  Links to amazon or other publishers are not secondary sources any more than a link to Staples' site is proof that a particular piece of paper is notable. -Markeer 15:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Following Firefly322's links shows several links to notable media coverage. --LTsmash97 —Preceding comment was added at 16:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)  — LTsmash97 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  -- jonny - m  t  07:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Not trying to be difficult but can you link one? I again went though the first few pages and only saw links to vendor sites, but I'm willing to accept my scanning was poorly done if given a concrete example. -Markeer 16:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources provided by User:Firefly322 are ample to demonstrate notability and the potential of this topic. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.