Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Roomies from Hell!!!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

College Roomies from Hell!!!

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The sources are:
 * 1) an article about another webcomic which only mentions CRFH in passing
 * 2) "Monkeys Fighting Robots", which is 404 and doesn't seem to have been an RS anyway
 * 3) Passing mention in an article about a sister project
 * 4) WCCA awards
 * 5) Another article about an unrelated comic

In the past, the Web Cartoonist's Choice Award has been deemed not to be a major player for WP:NWEB standards. The sourcing here is very superficial at best beyond the award (which, by the way, isn't even mentioned on the award's Wikipedia article), and a WP:BEFORE turned up nothing better. In short, I don't see any reason this is a notable webcomic. It's just another dusty piece of cruft from a different era of web content. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. 02:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. 02:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete – Maybe the author or their later webcomic are more notable, but this one clearly isn't it. ~ Maplestrip/Mable ( chat ) 06:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. I disageee that winning Web Cartoonists' Choice Awards is not sufficient for notability, here, however, we have only nominations. That's probably not enough, but I'll abstain this time. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:03, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Fails GNG to me, a couple of passing mentions isn't enough (also found ref here). I am unsure about whether it meets the second criteria for Notability (Web), The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization. Ideally, this award itself is also notable and already has a Wikipedia article. The awards has a (very borderline notable) WP article, but still meets the requirement, but it's not covered much in RS, so I don't think it's notable enough to be "well-known", so am leaning towards weak delete. VickKiang (talk) 05:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.