Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colleges of Distinction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Soft Delete. J04n(talk page) 00:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Colleges of Distinction

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no evidence that this college guide is notable. Ironically, the only reliable source I've found with significant coverage is a book by Zac Bissonnette basically calling it a pay-to-play scam.

It gets a lot of Google hits from press releases, but the Google Books results tell the real story: the aforementioned book, the site's own print edition, a couple passing mentions in Peterson's college guides, ads in city magazines, and a whole bunch of unrelated uses of the phrase.

The article was created by SnicholsCoD, whose username suggests they edited on behalf on Colleges of Distinction.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 00:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 02:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 23:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: I tagged this for Notability over 2 years ago and that position remains unchanged. I can see various press releases by colleges publicising their inclusion in the guide (which needs to be read in conjunction with the book text linked by the nominator above), but nothing to confirm the guide is notable. Fails WP:NWEB, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.