Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collegiates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 21:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Collegiates

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Film completely lacking in any notability whatsoever. Judging by the cast list it's a home movie, and the article fails to make it clear if it's anything more than an idea. Also, contested prod. Closedmouth (talk) 13:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Per WP:NFF. Likely a college joke/hoax (eg "Sequel - An interest of a sequel had every actor excited.So there will be a sequel.It will be called: Collegiates 2:Back on the Feild"). Release date of "September 14,2009" seems very specific for more than a year in advance. Debate (talk) 13:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Doh! Also, User:TylerDBryant created the article. He also apparently stars in the movie, along with Stacey Bryant (his sister?). Debate (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed, I made reference to that in my prod nomination. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I've just realised he's also created a sockpuppet account (I'm on the ball today): vs . Lovely. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability. Too much crystal-ball gazing as to a movie being scheduled for release next year. No sources to satisfy validity requirement. Could have been speedied. Edison (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Under which criterion? A7 doesn't cover films. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No real outright speedy for this that I can see unless you want to bend a G1 to death. The actors are 'all in the family' there is a WP:COI, and it is obviously a home made movie that is being vanity promoted for friends etc.  Negative on both WP:V and WP:RS... Poof... Obliterate. --Pmedema (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn. Was this film actually rated? Napsterbater (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 03:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.