Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colombia–Cyprus relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Colombia–Cyprus relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random laughable combination from the obsessive creator. non resident embasssies. and just 1 minor agreement between the 2 countries. LibStar (talk) 11:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as appears to be random ~ Excesses ~  (talk) 12:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - utterly random, with no evidence of notability through reliable sources presented. - Biruitorul Talk 15:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I'd really like to have said keep. To me relations between two soveriegn states are notable. However there wasn't really enough to demonstrate its notability or even to make a stub out of what is here. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - yet another really random piece of junk. Funny, but random. Also, none of it is sourced per WP:RS. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N and not a directory. Foreign relations of the 203 sovereign countries are best discussed in the article about the country, or a standalone article if a major country, rather than in 20,000 such binary stubs. A link to the country's foreign ministry website will provide more up-to-date info than a robostub created and then neglected. Edison (talk) 19:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: WikiProject International relations has some well thought out advice (see WikiProject International relations) for when bilateral relations between two nations are notable. This article does not even assert to meet any of them. Locke9k (talk) 21:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.