Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colombia – Czech Republic relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Colombia – Czech Republic relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. I could not find any real coverage of bilateral relations. also a search on Prague's English language newspaper shows up nothing on Colombia. LibStar (talk) 02:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Here's a Spanish language link -http://co.vlex.com/vid/43676269 - to an international jurisprudence peer-review site, discussing Checa, Colombia and Santa Fe de Bogota, dated 1997, in regard to Internacionalizacion de la Economia. --Mr Accountable (talk) 04:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And the Chamber of Commerce, http://www.camaracolombocheca.com/, link added to External links of the article. --Mr Accountable (talk) 04:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - insufficiently notable. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 05:13, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, and merging these articles into the diplomacy of articles. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of independent, in-depth coverage of the topic. - Biruitorul Talk 16:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced stub (just the embassy websites) of no expressed notability and none that i can establish on my own. The problem? Absence of reliable sources that discuss this supposed relationship in any depth.Bali ultimate (talk) 03:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge The bilateral articles into one Foreign relations of country X by country article per country. Edison (talk) 03:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep According to the Czech sources there is important economic and political cooperation between Colombia and CR. This link (already added in the article) contains also futher detailed references (unfortunately in the Czech language). The topic is notable for Wikipedia, and may be an interesting reading. The problem is rather with sloppy editing of some users here. They create articles like robots, without care and without knowing, where the problem is and what the topic is. This is really damaging and unencyclopedic. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:05, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Excellent article, notable and verifiable. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * how do you define "excellent"? would it qualify for good article? LibStar (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No secondary sources, only government ones. No indication anywhere of the notability of the article's topic to make it stand out from the other 20 000. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Plenty of well-sourced material - far too much to be replicated and maintained in the tables in both Foreign relations of Colombia and Foreign relations of the Czech Republic. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, their relationship has developed over many years and is now clealry notable. Smile a While (talk) 17:39, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I didn't bother commenting in it before, when the article was first nominated, but seeing it now, I have to say Keep. It does now have some valid content to it, showing a notable relationship does exist between the two nations.   D r e a m Focus  19:53, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.