Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colombo Post


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. no valid argument for deletion, but. I cant really call it speedy after 2 relistings....  DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Colombo Post

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article is about a Sri Lanka based newspaper. No indication that it is currently in circulation. Website too is down. A STRONOMYINERTI A ( TALK ) 17:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Neither having ceased publication (if that is true) nor having a non-functioning website is a valid reason for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * True, but going through the search results for this article does not help establishing a clear case for the notability of this article. A STRONOMYINERTI A  ( TALK ) 17:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  00:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep: I couldn't understand what is actually in the mind of Astronomyinertia. Initially he is coming out the reason for nomination is - "....No indication that it is currently in circulation" and when Phil Bridger is raising his objection he is jumping into a different reason.Sudar123 (talk) 13:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * speedy keep, definitely notable.-- Deathlaser : Chat  17:35, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.