Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colon sex

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge/redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:31, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Colon sex
Only relevant web hit in the first several pages of results (Oh, the things I do for Wikipedia) besides randomized or near-randomized pornographic website hucksterism (and surprisingly little of that) is a pun on the colon (punctuation) from somebody's weblog. No evidence the term is used, unverifiable, misrepresents the extent to which it's "known in the gay scene" or "among heterosexual couples", and uses Wikipedia to promote a neologism. Creation of the article was the only contribution of User:134.155.31.84. Samaritan 16:01, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Without wanting to seem sexually naïve, is this even possible? :s  Chameleon 16:22, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to anal sex. The colon ends where the rectum begins, so pretty much all anal sex is, by definition, colon sex. -- 131.94.17.194 16:59, 4 May 2005 (UTC) -- BD Abram son thi m k 17:01, 2005 May 4 (UTC) (somehow got signed out before I voted).
 * Merge into Anal sex This is also realted to deep fisting. Klonimus 17:58, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:13, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful into Anal sex. --Angr/comhrá 05:59, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge &rarr; Anal sex. —Markaci 2005-05-6 T 03:39 Z
 * keep or merge please Yuckfoo 20:42, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
 * yuck. merge with anal sex.  Sensation002 23:40, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.