Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonel Tennis Complex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Nicholls State Colonels.  Sandstein  22:46, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Colonel Tennis Complex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Either with the plural colonels, or singular colonel (which is the official name as per college sources), can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show that it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 *  Keep or merge - Keep or merge to Nicholls_State_Colonels. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 *  Keep - This is a NCAA Division I facility. It's the highest level of college athletics and it's been established many times over that these facilities qualify as notable. The article has four independent references and five overall, which is more than enough. In addition, two of the references are media outlets. This is a definite keep. User:Annieann1 (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge – Just because it's a Division I facility, doesn't necessarily make it notable. Merge to the main athletics article is the best option here. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest   23:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 *  Keep - The article has multiple media references, 21 independent references, and 22 references overall. There are more references available, but 22 references are enough to justify notability. Maybe not every Division I venue qualifies, but this one does especially with all of the references. This Division I tennis venue is notable and needs to be kept. User:Spatms (talk) 16:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 19:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Are we keeping it standalone or are we merging?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep/Stand-alone User:Spatms (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep/Stand-alone User:Annieann1 (talk) 22:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with Nicholls State Colonels. References seem to be WP:ROUTINE. What little info there is can easily fit in a section of another article. Lizard  (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Nicholls State Colonels. While at a glance there does appear to be a spree of references, a closer inspection shows this to be a case of WP:BOMBARDMENT - the vast majority of them are about the teams, and matches played at the complex, not the complex itself. There may well be enough out there for this Division I facility to be spun-out later, but for now, this should be merged and tagged as R with possibilities. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.