Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ColorIURIS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

ColorIURIS

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested prod. Article about a copyright management tool. Despite winning some minor awards there's no good evidence of notability - which in this case would mean widespread and growing adoption. In fact this search yields only 251 results, mostly irrelevant. andy (talk) 10:55, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Not seeing notability, sources all seem to be in Spanish Bob House 884 (talk) 01:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Sources in Spanish can still be RS - and I'm somewhat concerned, given that the article seems to be a fairly straight translation of es:Coloriuris, that no mention has previously been made of this or get the opinion of Spanish-speaking Wikipedians. PWilkinson (talk) 20:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CORP. Non-notable and appears to be intended as advertising. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.