Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Color StyleWriter 2400


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Apple printers. Shimeru (talk) 01:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Color StyleWriter 2400

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Limited notability (no refs to prove notability), no reliable (3rd party) references. In addition, article violates WP:IINFO. ℳøℕø 05:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep   Reliable ref for all of these printers available: "A look back at Apple's Printers", Benj Edwards. Macworld, Dec 10, 2009. There will also be reviews for each of them, which are also reliable refs. No attempt to follow WP:BEFORE in these or the other similar nominations. That said, the very similar printers of each group could probably be usefully merged. DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to an Apple Inc. printers article, with the other nominated printers. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 00:15, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge Not individually notable, but the Apple printers as a product line are probably notable (see DGG's link). --Cyber cobra (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. They all have suitable coverage.  This should've been discussed on the talk pages, not brought straight to AFD.  And all of the AFDs should be combined since they all have the same coverage, and are basically the same thing. Pro· 1500· 2200· 2400· 2500· 4100· 4500· 6500  D r e a m Focus  09:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to an article with a list of Apple printers. Notable collectively but not individually . Edison (talk) 19:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.