Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorado Amendment 58 (2008)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 21:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Colorado Amendment 58 (2008)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Failed state legislation. Seems to fail WP:IINFO. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or maybe merge into a single article containing November 2008 U.S. state ballot propositions. It looks like there exists information that could be used to improve an article about this. As a state-wide ballot proposition, it's probably notable enough. As for that other wiki that I linked to, I'm not sure if it's an appropriate substitute for Wikipedia for information like this—does it have sufficient neutrality, for example? TheFeds  02:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheFeds (talk • contribs)
 * Keep - I'm not in a position to look up the appropriate references, because I'm not in Colorado, but this has to be documented well enough for at least a small article. Any proposed legislative amendment that is voted on by the population of a state has to be notable. There has to be supporting doctrine for the amendment, parliamentary debate, and so on. - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't think this information should be deleted from Wikipedia. I do think that it is a possibility to merge this into a larger article; however, let it be noted that other states such as California also have articles for each individual ballot proposition (Search the categories for California ballot propositions, 2008). --Heero Kirashami (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.   —Cunard (talk) 06:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep backed by reliable and verifiable sources to support notability. Alansohn (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Everyking (talk) 04:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 19:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.