Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorado Open (darts)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 18:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Colorado Open (darts)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nomination also includes:

This was deleted at Articles for deletion/Charlotte Open but the article was not tagged with an AFD notice. The close was therefore undone by the deleting Admin after a DRV so I'm relisting this properly. As the DRV closer I take no formal position on the article. Spartaz Humbug! 16:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all (qualified) with no restriction on re-creation when the competitions have inherent notability. The problem we face in this discussion is that there are a number of well known darts players who are listed in some of the articles, but a competition cannot inherit notability from its entrants. While it can be argued that a well known player will not enter a non notable competition, this is not a valid argument. The only arguments we can accept are the existence of citations in WP:RS. Primary sources and inherently notable players do not do the trick. Where reliable citations are provided then my !vote will obviously not apply to that individual article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all as per my original nomination at Articles for deletion/Charlotte Open, unless independent reliable sourcing is added. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete all as failing WP:EVENT, as an aside I was very tempted to tag a number of them A7 as they make no claim to significance.  LGA talk  edits   00:35, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all for the reasons stated above. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.