Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colorado balloon incident (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NO DON'T  Shii (tock) 06:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: Close restored again after undid the close. Tim Song (talk) 06:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Colorado balloon incident
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

DELETE. We need to achieve a consensus here. Clearly, Wikipedia is not a news site, and this article fails WP:NOTNEWS. JBsupreme (talk) 06:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy close. This has been through an AFD and a DRV in less than a week. Not enough time has passed for us to be able to gauge consensus, so we should close this and reopen in a few months. The Wordsmith Communicate 06:05, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: At this point closed the AfD, but  undid the close, and the following comments were added. Tim Song (talk) 06:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy close: While this nomination might have been made in good faith, it strikes me as being in poor taste. When a no-consensus closure is resoundingly endorsed on Sunday, to come back on Wednesday, saying, "We need to achieve a consensus here", has something of a "screw-you-guys" effect. Anyhow, consensus was reached in the DRV, and the consensus is that there is no consensus to delete. Should that consensus not be respected? Cosmic Latte (talk) 06:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Strange, I saw this as closed by an admin a couple of revisions ago. Antipastor (talk) 06:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.