Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colton Primary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 22:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Colton Primary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Primary school. Zero refs, for which it has been tagged for over 2 years. Appears to be non-notable, per what I understand is our standard approach with primary schools. Merger was proposed nearly 4 years ago, but that did not lead to a merge. Delete (w/redirect to whatever makes sense would be fine) appears to be in order. Epeefleche (talk) 05:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing that could establish notability. The best the article can offer is that the school used to be based in a building that was almost interesting. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 01:57, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:GNG or current school guidelines. Edinburgh  Wanderer  22:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Old building does not appear to be listed so this cannot be used for notability. There is no evidence that English Heritage even considered the building for listing - the article just states speculation (by whom? and on what basis?) that it might get listed.  Certainly, I don't see why ownership of the building would affect its status with regard to listing.  No other reason for notability found or asserted. No real coverage beyond the usual routine sources. Pit-yacker (talk) 22:43, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to locality or school governing body per longstanding consensus. I'm also expressing concern with the large numbers of school nominations at the moment; it can't be expected that all editors be able to respond to this mass act of deletionist ideology. &tilde;danjel [ talk | contribs ] 00:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG - no rreason to keep. If necesssary merge to Colton, Leeds but may need someone with local knowledge to fill in. Fmph (talk) 12:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.