Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia University Muslim Students Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Columbia University Muslim Students Association

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable university student club. No assertion of notability other than an unsourced unverified statement that it might be "one of" the oldest clubs of its types. Even if it was the oldest, I don't think that meets the threshold. There is an exchange on the article's talk page about its coverage in the press, or lack thereof. Agent 86 23:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Based on the information given above, I agree with the deletion. Bbagot 00:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like yet another case of getting carried away with Muslim pride. --Action Jackson IV 01:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Be civil and assume good faith. As Caknuck notes below, articles on student organizations  are not uncommon, e.g. Articles for deletion/Old Aquinians Hockey Club (2nd nomination) and in other cases we don't accuse the authors of "hockey players' pride". - Aagtbdfoua 04:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Per precedent, local chapters of student organizations are inherently non-notable. The only claim to notability is unsourced. Caknuck 01:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I tagged this as speedy (for not asserting notability) when it was first created, and when it passed speedy I decided to give it some time to be improved.  The article has not improved.  It's a non-notable student org. - Aagtbdfoua 04:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no assertion of notability bar having been around for a while. Moreschi Request a recording? 12:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Other than being old it doesn't really have anything even suggesting it's important. James086 Talk  16:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.