Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbitech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Columbitech

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Page was created by spam blocked account and reads more like a pamphlet than an article. Was denied CSD so I wanted to bring this here. No notable news mentions. avs5221 (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 01:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The WSJ source in the article, in conjunction with the two other sources, arguably confers notability. I certainly disagree that the article reads like some spam pamphlet -- it's perfectly encyclopedic in tone. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  06:23, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - Being created by a blocked account is of no relevancy, the compagny is notable and there are plenty of sources on the net. -RobertMel (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.