Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combat 786


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Combat 786

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unremarkable group that has had no citations added in the seven years since the article was created. UKWikiGuy (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete - Per nom. There has been plenty of time and nothing of substance has been added. Gamble2Win (talk) 10:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -I think sufficient proof of notability is given in the article. passes WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: - this is not strictly speaking true. The single article from the Guardian was purely of a speculative nature, and the events that it mentions did not occur, nor have the group "Combat 786" ever been spoken of again. UKWikiGuy (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete unless substantially improved (with citations) duing AFD period. Do we really need an article on a bunch of Muslim thugs.  The lack of improvement of the articel over a long period points to their being NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, high level of speculation, needs more WP:Verifiablity - DonCalo (talk) 13:09, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence this group ever existed except on the day in 2001 when the Guardian paid a visit. Sussexonian (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.