Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Come Clean (Dwarves album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn by nominator Niteshift36 (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Come Clean (Dwarves album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:NALBUMS. No evidence that is charted at Allmusic or Billboard. No evidence of significant coverage by reliable sources. Sole source used for the article is a one paragraph review. Only 3 articles link to it Niteshift36 (talk) 08:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * What did you do regarding WP:BEFORE? You appear to have nominated several articles for deletion in a rather short space of time.--Michig (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes I did make several in a short period of time. I had them all lined up. I did my checks before I started the nominations. Of course checking Allmusic and Billboard is a breeze. You just look at the band and find out that they've never had anything chart. Nothing. That took a whole 2 minutes and covered every album they've ever done. Instead of trying to insinuate things about me, why not concern yourself with finding the significant coverage you keep saying you have for these noms. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I simply asked, as you didn't mention any searches in the nomination. Calm down. Allmusic and Billboard are not the only sources available.--Michig (talk) 10:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Nor did I say those were the only sources I checked. However, they are darn good for finding out if this band ever charted in the US. And they haven't. Your insinuation was clear. Niteshift36 (talk) 10:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The Dwarves are notable, and so is the album per WP:NALBUMS: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." Reviews, etc here.  Lugnuts  (talk) 09:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The key word is "may". Look at the rest of NALBUMS: "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting.". The article is a single sentence and a track listing. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Add this Pitchfork Media review to what we already have and it's clearly a notable album.--Michig (talk) 10:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand, article does have notability, but needs expansion and more refs/cites. A re-write of the context would help greatly (it really is poorly written) Alan  -  talk  18:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * One source you use is one page, yet that source is used in at least 7 different articles. How significant can the coverage of each album be if at least 7 of them are on the same page? Can't be that in depth. The same sources keep popping up. Single paragraph reviews at Allmusic, the same page in a book for 7 different albums, when no other coverage is found Pitchfork did a review. If they are so notable, why is there so little variety in the sources over so many albums? Niteshift36 (talk) 19:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I think we all get the idea that you're in favour of deletion, thanks.--Michig (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And I think we all get the idea that you want to keep it no matter how many trivial mentions it takes. But it hasn't stopped you from continuing to respond either. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - like everyone else I am copying and pasting my vote for all of the AfD's of the Dwarves albums, except for the quickie compilations. The nominator's reasons for the AfD's are roughly the same, everyone else's comments and votes are roughly the same. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 20:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The album appears to have received significant coverage from multiple sources. Rlendog (talk) 03:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The coverage for this album in the sources presented is enough in my view to satisfy WP:NALBUMS.  Gongshow  Talk 06:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.