Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy Nest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Comedy Nest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is a comedy club in Montreal. Article makes no assertion of notability. Google Web, Google News, and Google News Archives searches for ("comedy nest") produce nothing that satisfies WP:GNG. I found some local coverage in the Montreal Gazette, and a profile of the owner (which didn't discuss the club itself in any detail) at canada.com. There's a very brief description at the Lonely Planet website; a passage in the HTML that doesn't show on the page (in Chrome, right-click page and select "View page source") reads "Ranked #431 of 682 things to do in Montreal by Lonely Planet travellers", which doesn't suggest a high degree of notability. Appears to fail GNG. Ammodramus (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ( t  •  c ) 03:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see WP:GNG. In addition to the usual searches, I attempted search via Highbeam, found only a single passing mention in a Boston Globe article.  --j⚛e deckertalk 17:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.