Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cometman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Cometman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page has been an orphan since it's creation in 2006. It has no references, and its one external link provides very little information about the subject. A search for the character and/or the title he appeared in only returns results for Wikipedia and mirrored content. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. There is obviously not enough here to stand on its own as an article, and amazingly, some of what is here is wrong -- specifically, this was an Australian publication, not a British one.  Generally, I'd prefer a merge/redirect result here over deletion, but none of the articles that would serve as upmerge targets exist.  It's unlkely that the comic itself (variously titled The Invisible Avenger and Invisible Avenger Comics) would support an article either, although its publication is involved in a fairly complicated bit of Australian comics history.  Despite ostensibly being printed by Jayar Studios and/or Illustrated Publications, this was very likely the work of publisher/printing company Ayers & James (best known in the field for the Australian reprints of Classics Illustrated) via its probable shell subsidiary Magazine Management (note that this is very much not the Magazine Management of Marvel Comics history).  There's probably an article to be had in there, somewhere, but it's not here right now.  And it's not this stublet about Cometman, regardless. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as having been insufficient in-depth coverage by independent third-party sources. If links are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.