Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comfort (definition)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Lear's Fool 21:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Comfort (definition)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Also nominating Comfort definition

Is this in wikipedia's scope? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 10:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unencyclopedic, also WP:DICDEF. I've A10'd the other article mentioned as a duplicate. Note the creator of the article appears to be the author of two books which the creator is trying to use as references, have advised him of COI and SPAM. Mjroots (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.
 * Redirect to comfort, which currently is a disambiguation page that also points to comfort. This article appears to want to be about the ergonomics of chairs, an entirely worthy subject for which we already have articles.  If the author has written a book about the subject, he should be welcomed and directed towards improving then.  Would be open to an eventual article on the ergonomics of chairs, but this title would not work.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - and I don't see how this is a useful redirect. -- Whpq (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per WP:DICDEF. Nwlaw63 (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.