Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comic City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Comic City

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously up for PROD but was removed by the article creator without a reason. This article has no in-line references and doesn't seem to hold notability, the references given don't help it either. The first reference seems to be an advertisement for it. The second reference has basically no information. The third reference seem to hold some ground. The fourth reference might be a blog entry, I can't really tell.  Ana  r  chyte   11:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC) EDIT: A possible outcome might be userfying it (see the talk page.  Ana  r  chyte   11:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for now at best as there are listed sources but nothing else to suggest better notability and improvement here yet. Notifying taggers and .  SwisterTwister   talk  01:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No real sources, or indications of notability beyond size-- Jac 16888 Talk 00:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Current sources don't support that it meets notability criteria, and searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage of this particular subject with this name to show it meets those criteria either.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.