Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comic Related


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. —Cleared as filed. 21:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Comic Related
Delete Alexa Traffic Rank for : No Data, no googles, links are college newsletter. Dakota ~  ε  01:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator, only link their website direct link from page not found on google, no other hits. Non notable website'.-- Dakota'' ~  ε  01:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Not notable. Delete ike9898 01:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Certainly not notable. Strong Delete PeteShanosky 03:12, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Plea to Keep - Please read the details (recently added to the page). Though low on exposure as a site, there is real history here which I will continue to detail should this page be given a chance to evolve.  I bring more to the table (historically speaking) than was obvious when the first deletion notice went up.  The site itself may seem "not notable" at this time, but that is quickly changing and the history leading up to it is notable and something I plan to incorporate in greater detail over the next few days.  There are real reasons for posting the entry.  I have experienced quite a bit of comic history leading up to the creation of this site. - ChuckMoore
 * Google relevance - Please google search on its previous and now alternate domain www.hydrofest.com to see google relevance. The site was retooled when it relauched and moved to the new, specific domain in September of 2004. - ChuckMoore
 * Thank you for your consideration I will visit this spot regularly and take your criticism to heart as I expand the entry.  I want to be a solid contributor to the community and have all the respect in the world for Wikipedia having used it continually in my daily life for years. - ChuckMoore
 * You can vote Keep but you need to sign your user name. It didn't [Google and there is no Alexic traffic rank So it doesn't meet the minimum of notability for a website. It is up to the voters.-- Dakota ~  ε  05:04, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yeah, I know we're not suppsoed to go on Alexa and Google hits, but if we can't even find anything about them...to the curb. RasputinAXP  talk contribs 05:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete sometimes, as with this, google and alexa are fine for noting that this does not belong. Eusebeus 07:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete sorry PageAuthor. Draeco 10:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Trying to understand - So is it simply the level of popularity that makes an entry like Newsarama more relevant for inclusion than Comic Related? Both are comic book websites?  More to the point, how about the blog discussed at Comics Curmudgeon, or Nitrozac, or Oddlotsirregulars.com, or Comic Book Universe Battles rate entries?  Many of these barley have an entry written and do not present any notable bits of historical fact regarding their relevance yet they meet the standard for includion?  I thought Wikipedia was more about building an interlocking history of the world rather than simply covering what generates hits in google.  I honestly want to understand. - ChuckMoore
 * Delete. Nn, ad, vanity.  Chuck, Wikipedia is not an "interlocking history of the world", it is an encyclopedia, and entries into an encyclopedia must meet certain standards.  It is simply not a well-known enough website at this time to merit inclusion.  Starry Eyes  11:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Trying to understand - Understood. Build popularity then return.  That said, how are the other entires I referenced worthy of inclusion?  How do Comics Curmudgeon, or Nitrozac, or Oddlotsirregulars.com, or Comic Book Universe Battles rate entries? - ChuckMoore
 * Thanks for understanding. And you know, some of those you mentioned are probably not worthy of inclusion and should also be deleted.  Starry Eyes  11:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable website. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 15:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not appear to meet WP:WEB guidelines. -- Dragonfiend 15:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Thanks to all who posted. I learned about Wikipedia, will go get myself established and return when my google rank can stand the test of relevancy.  Cheers! :-) ChuckMoore
 * Delete, nerdcruft. incog 04:45, 31 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.