Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comic and Curious Cats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect as no reliable sourcing could be found to pass WP:GNG. (Non-administrator closure.) LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Comic and Curious Cats

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBOOK and completely unsourced. Couldn't find any significant coverage on it LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:33, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (shout)  @ 20:00, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (banter)  @ 20:01, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: So far I'm not finding a huge amount, but I am finding a bit that suggests more coverage in that some books about Carter tend to list it as a highlight of her work. I am finding some mild use of it in classrooms, but not enough to really make a big difference in notability. It looks like if there is more coverage, it never got uploaded onto the Internet. Most of what I'm finding mentions it in relation to Carter, so if all else fails I'd suggest redirecting this to her bibliography section. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree to to the redirect LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect – To the parent author. Not enough notability to warranty a fulsome article other than a stub. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 17:01, 8 August 2014 (UTC)